Agenda item

To debate the Group motions submitted in accordance with Standing Order 41.

 

Members are asked to note:

 

·            The motions submitted for debate have been attached.

 

·            Where a motion concerns an executive function, nothing passed can be actioned until approved by the Executive or an officer with the relevant delegated power.

 

(Agenda republished to include the Group motion submitted for debate on 9 September 2025 and amendments moved by the Labour Group on the Conservative & Liberal Democrats motions and Liberal Democrats on the 2^nd Labour motion on 15 September 2025)

Before moving on to consider the motions listed on the summons, the Mayor advised members that a total of 40 minutes had been set aside for consideration of the four motions submitted for debate, based on an initial allocation of 10 minutes per motion. Should the time taken to consider the first motion be less than 10 minutes he advised that the remaining time available would be rolled forward for consideration of the remaining motions.

 

10.1  1st Motion (Conservative Group) – Addressing Safety and Fly-Tipping Risks in Bee Corridor Management in Brent

 

The Mayor invited Councillor Jayanti Patel to move the first motion, which had been submitted on behalf of the Conservative Group.  Councillor J. Patel began by, highlighting the way in which the motion had been presented to reflect resident concerns about safety, hygiene, and accessibility of bee corridors and wildflower initiatives, with specific issues identified including fly-tipping, unmanaged vegetation, dumping of waste and litter often in areas adjacent to where children played.  It was also pointed out that overgrown grass near footpaths and crossings, particularly around Kingsbury Roundabout, had created hazards for pedestrians and drivers with enhanced risks in relation to fire safety also identified as a cause for concern.

 

As an alternative approach, Councillor Jayanti Patel highlighted the way similar challenges had been addressed elsewhere, including the use of hanging baskets within Harrow with bee-friendly plants which had been installed across lamp posts and railings supporting the approach towards biodiversity and corridor links between green spaces.  In summing up, he highlighted the call within the motion to ensure Brent's bee and wildflower corridors were managed in a safe, welcoming, and responsible way, which he hoped members would support given the concerns being raised by local residents.

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Jayanti Patel for moving the motion and then drew members attention to an amendment submitted by Councillor Kabir on behalf of the Labour Group, which had been circulated in advance of the meeting.

 

In moving the amendment, Councillor Kabir began by highlighting the importance of the Council’s commitment to environmental initiatives such as the bee and wildflower corridors across the borough as well as climate change action.  Whilst acknowledging the importance in listening to concerns raised around the impact of green projects it was felt the original motion had failed to recognise the successful work being undertaken across Brent that was making a real difference in bringing cleaner air, flourishing wildlife, and a collective ambition to do better back to the borough.  As an example, reference was made to over 7 miles of wildflowers having been sown across the borough since 2019 creating 22 wildflower meadows which have added bursts of colour to parks, as well as helping to reverse declining insect populations delivering real change which it was felt would have a material impact on the borough for many years to come.

 

In highlighting that the original motion had included reference to work being undertaken by a number of other Labour administrations across London in relation to the climate emergency, the need to ensure this activity was undertaken hand-in-hand with local residents was also acknowledged.  In moving the amendment it was, however, felt that residents were already feeling the benefit of this action in Brent through access to more parks and open spaces, repair cafes and the introduction of school streets enabling children to breathe cleaner air and with the Council also just having awarded an additional £8m to local community projects designed to further improve the future public realm across Brent.  In accepting the need to ensure that action to tackle the climate change was balanced against the safety and overall look of the borough, it was felt that the amendment moved alongside the commitments already made would ensure this was the approach adopted moving forward.  On this basis the amendment moved by Councillor Kabir was as follows:

 

To add the wording underlined and delete the wording indicated:

 

“Addressing Safety and Fly-Tipping Risks in Bee Corridor Management in Brent

 

This Council notes

 

·            That the Conservative Group all political groups have supported and encouraged the environmental value of Brent’s bee corridors and wildflower initiatives in promoting biodiversity and supporting pollinator populations.

 

·            The Council’s commitment to doing everything in its power to offset the impacts of climate change; and to protect biodiversity across the borough.

 

This Council further notes, however

 

That the recent unmanaged long grass and overgrown vegetation along designated bee corridors in our parks and open spaces along with uncut grass verges have in some cases led to increased instances of:

 

·            Fly-tipping of cans, bottles, and concealed waste such as dog fouling, which poses hygiene risks where children play and track contamination into homes.

 

·            Residents reporting reduced visibility near footpaths, crossings, and residential boundaries — notably along Fryent Way, creating hazards for pedestrians and vehicles.

 

·            Fire risks during dry periods, as evidenced by the fire in Roe Green Park on 25th August.

 

·            Concerns raised by residents regarding safety and accessibility, particularly in overgrown areas such as Eton Grove Park, Queensbury Station Parade, Kingsbury and other roundabouts in Brent.

 

This Council recognises

 

That similar challenges have been addressed successfully elsewhere:

 

·            Newham Council’s fly-tipping campaign used pavement stencils, “crime scene” tape, and community-led clean-up events to reduce dumping by over 60%.

 

·            Camden Council’s visibility motion mandated regular trimming near junctions and crossings, supported by resident-led audits to identify problem areas.

 

·            Brent’s own corridor strategy has previously trialled rotational sowing and visible placement of wildflower zones to balance biodiversity and public engagement.

 

And that Brent Council has introduced a number of successful initiatives in recent years to tackle these issues, such as the popular Community Skip scheme, and Green Corridors and Neighbourhoods in Church End, Roundwood, and Kingsbury.

 

This Council, therefore, resolves to request that the Cabinet Member for Public Realm and Enforcement produces a report to explore:

 

(1)       Implementing a zoned maintenance strategy, ensuring continued regular trimming near pedestrian routes, junctions, and residential grass verges while preserving biodiversity in core areas — such as the open spaces on Fryent Way away from built-up zones.

 

(2)       Introduce Increasing the amount of clear signage and QR-coded educational materials, which are already in place by all of Brent’s bee corridors, to inform residents about the purpose of bee corridors and discourage illegal dumping which residents across Brent are witnessing.

 

(3)       Republishing a transparent annual maintenance schedule and designate points of contact for reporting fly-tipping and safety concerns arising from these bee corridors, which was made available to residents when the bee corridors were launched and sets out the cycle of maintenance and how to raise concerns with fly-tipping or safety.

 

(4)       Engage The ways in which the Council already engages with local communities, “Friends of” groups, and residents to co-develop monitoring and feedback mechanisms, ensuring resident voices shape future bee corridor management.

 

(5)       Exploring creative deterrents such as pavement stencils, visual markers, and community-led stewardship initiatives to discourage fly-tipping and promote shared responsibility through our Don’t Mess with Brent campaign.”

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Kabir for moving the amendment before inviting other members to speak, with the following contributions received.

 

In opening the debate, Councillor Mistry, highlighting her personal background and commitment to environmental causes, felt it was important to seek a collaborative approach in support of addressing the environmental challenges identified.  Whilst supporting the work being undertaken by the Council around biodiversity, the need to recognise the concerns outlined within the original motion were highlighted as important in terms of adjusting the approach and focussing the creation and maintenance of the corridors and meadows across core areas.  In expressing support for the original motion, it was hoped the use of alternative methods such as encouraging borough-wide front garden competitions would also be considered to engage children and other local residents in the process of environmental improvement.

 

As a further contribution Councillor Krupa Sheth welcomed the debate, which she felt further highlighted the success achieved through the introduction of Bee and wildflower corridors in Brent in boosting biodiversity and contributing towards the Council’s Net Zero 2030 target.  At the same time it was pointed out, however, in response to the original motion that much of the action being sought was already being delivered including systems in place to sow low-growing plants to keep sight lines clear, the early cutting of verges being undertaken when needed and fire breaks being mowed during heatwaves to protect public safety.  Members were also advised that each Bee corridor already included signage explaining their purpose with a well-established system in place to respond to concerns around fly-tipping or safety via the Fix My Street app.

 

In addition, the Parks Service was also involved in regular engagement and collaboration with Friends of the Parks Groups and the local community, including support on community litter picks and, it was pointed, out remained open to continued partnership work going forward.  This activity was also being undertaken alongside the Council’s Don’t Mess with Brent campaign which had been designed to combat the issues and nuisance created by fly-tipping and (members were reminded) had been recently praised both within Parliament and by the Secretary of State for Environment and Rural Affairs during a recent visit to the borough.  Whilst pleased to note the motion had therefore recognised the value of this work, alongside efforts being made by other Labour Council’s across London, it was felt Brent had already demonstrated a lead in seeking to reverse the impact of austerity and improve Public Realm ensuring this continued to be well communicated and residents remained engaged.  On this basis, Councillor Krupa advised she would be supporting the amendment moved in seeking to continue the work outlined.

 

As a final contribution. Councillor Lorber sought to challenge the approach outlined by Councillor Krupa Sheth in responding to the motion, especially across areas such Alperton which he felt had not been subject to the activity required in relation to management of the corridors.  Concern was expressed that, once established, the areas were left to become overgrown with weeds and full or rubbish, which was also a trend he felt being witnessed across parks and grass verges throughout the borough, with residents having to endure the resulting mess and nuisance.

 

At this stage, the Mayor advised that the time limit allocated for debate on the motion had been reached.  In drawing the debate to a close, he therefore invited Councillor Jayanti Patel (as mover of the original motion) followed by Councillor Kabir (as mover of the amendment) to exercise their right of reply.

 

In summing up, Councillor Jayanti Patel queried the current approach towards the provision of bee corridors particularly in the Kingsbury area and whilst recognising the way in which they symbolised the Council’s commitment to biodiversity felt this also needed to be balanced against the concerns raised by local residents regarding their maintenance. In Queensberry Ward, as an example he once again reiterated the way in which unmanaged growth had led to fly-tipping, fire risks, and poor visibility near crossings and homes and in commending the motion, as original moved, felt that the concerns raised by local residents required urgent action.

 

As Councillor Kabir advised she did not wish to exercise a right of replay in relation to the amendment the Mayor, having thanked councillors for their contributions, then moved to the vote on the motion starting with the amendment moved by the Labour Group.

 

The amendment, as set out above, was then put to the vote and declared CARRIED.

 

The Mayor then moved on to put the substantive motion, as amended, to a vote which was declared CARRIED.

 

It was therefore RESOLVED to approve the following motion:

 

“Addressing Safety and Fly-Tipping Risks in Bee Corridor Management in Brent

 

This Council notes

 

•       That all political groups have supported and encouraged the environmental value of Brent’s bee corridors and wildflower initiatives in promoting biodiversity and supporting pollinator populations.

 

•       The Council’s commitment to doing everything in its power to offset the impacts of climate change; and to protect biodiversity across the borough.

 

This Council further notes, however

 

That the recent long grass and overgrown vegetation along designated bee corridors in our parks and open spaces along with uncut grass verges have in some cases led to increased instances of:

 

•       Fly-tipping of cans, bottles, and concealed waste such as dog fouling, which poses hygiene risks where children play and track contamination into homes.

 

•       Residents reporting reduced visibility near footpaths, crossings, and residential boundaries — notably along Fryent Way, creating hazards for pedestrians and vehicles.

 

•       Fire risks during dry periods, as evidenced by the fire in Roe Green Park on 25th August.

 

•       Concerns raised by residents regarding safety and accessibility, particularly in overgrown areas such as Eton Grove Park, Queensbury Station Parade, Kingsbury and other roundabouts in Brent.

 

This Council recognises

 

That similar challenges have been addressed successfully elsewhere:

 

•       Newham Council’s fly-tipping campaign used pavement stencils, “crime scene” tape, and community-led clean-up events to reduce dumping by over 60%.

 

•       Camden Council’s visibility motion mandated regular trimming near junctions and crossings, supported by resident-led audits to identify problem areas.

 

•       Brent’s own corridor strategy has previously trialled rotational sowing and visible placement of wildflower zones to balance biodiversity and public engagement.

 

And that Brent Council has introduced a number of successful initiatives in recent years to tackle these issues, such as the popular Community Skip scheme, and Green Corridors and Neighbourhoods in Church End, Roundwood, and Kingsbury.

 

This Council, therefore, resolves to request that the Cabinet Member for Public Realm and Enforcement produces a report to explore:

 

(1)    Implementing a zoned maintenance strategy, ensuring continued regular trimming near pedestrian routes, junctions, and residential grass verges while preserving biodiversity in core areas — such as the open spaces on Fryent Way away from built-up zones.

 

(2)    Increasing the amount of clear signage and QR-coded educational materials, which are already in place by all of Brent’s bee corridors, to inform residents about the purpose of bee corridors and discourage illegal dumping which residents across Brent are witnessing.

 

(3)    Republishing a transparent annual maintenance schedule and designate points of contact for reporting fly-tipping and safety concerns arising from these bee corridors, which was made available to residents when the bee corridors were launched and sets out the cycle of maintenance and how to raise concerns with fly-tipping or safety.

 

(4)    The ways in which the Council already engages with local communities, “Friends of” groups, and residents to co-develop monitoring and feedback mechanisms, ensuring resident voices shape future bee corridor management.

 

(5)    Exploring creative deterrents such as pavement stencils, visual markers, and community-led stewardship initiatives to discourage fly-tipping and promote shared responsibility through our Don’t Mess with Brent campaign.”

 

10.2    2nd Motion (Liberal Democrats Group) – Standing United against Racism and Xenophobia in Brent

 

The Mayor then invited Councillor Lorber to move the second motion, which had been submitted on behalf of the Liberal Democrats Group.  As context to the motion, Councillor Lorber began by highlighting his personal background and commitment in seeking to stand against racism and expressed concern at what he described as the recent horrific scenes with police being attacked by self-described proud nationalists and also at the foreign intervention of powerful individuals from America in seeking to challenge the legitimacy of the democratically elected UK government.  Referring to his background as a refugee, concern was also expressed at the attacks being witnessed across the UK on individual’s homes and in hotels where asylum seekers had been placed.  In recognising the increase in what he regarded as racist and xenophobic rhetoric and use of inflammatory language designed to scapegoat migrants and minority communities alongside Brent’s status as one of the most diverse and welcoming boroughs in the UK, Councillor Lorber advised that the motion had been presented to emphasise the need as a community to stand up and show leadership in making clear that the type of behaviour being witnesses was unacceptable and would not be tolerated in the borough, with confirmation provided that the amendment submitted by the Labour Group was also supported.

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Lorber for moving the motion and then drew members attention to an amendment submitted by Councillor Benea on behalf of the Labour Group, previously referred to and circulated in advance of the meeting.

 

In moving the amendment, Councillor Benea began by thanking the Liberal Democrat group for bringing forward the original motion as an important antidote to the divisive headlines witnessed over recent weeks in relation to migration and refugees.  In terms of the proposed amendment, it was pointed out this had not been designed as a political point-scoring exercise but to highlight the work already being undertaken by the Council and in seeking to ensure that the position of councillors position as democratically elected local representatives was used to counter hatred and demonstrate an ongoing commitment to the refugee and migrant communities in Brent in order to send a clear message that the Council stood with them.

 

As a first-generation migrant from Romania, Councillor Benea shared her personal experience of leaving home to start a new life in the UK, making it her purpose to ensure this remained a safe and credible option for others searching for a new beginning.  In highlighting the privilege felt in being part of an organisation that was committed to demonstrating its support for migrants, the opportunity was also taken to remind members of the motion she had previously moved which had committed Brent to becoming a Borough of Sanctuary, as a place proud of its vibrant and diverse history and one which would always strive to do more for those fleeing persecution.  In recognising how this sentiment had been reflected in support being provided for refugees around housing and welfare, employment and immigration advice and through the efforts to close health inequality gaps exposed by the Brent Poverty Commission, Councillor Benea ended by commending the amendment to all members and hoping that all would join her in standing on the side of the borough’s migrant communities.  On this basis the amendment moved by Councillor Benea was as follows:

 

To add the wording underlined and delete the wording indicated:

 

“Standing United against Racism and Xenophobia in Brent

 

In recent years, particularly after the Brexit referendum, there has been a disturbing rise in racist and xenophobic rhetoric in public discourse, much of it amplified by political parties and figures on the far right and reactionary elements who seek to divide our communities. These groups have used inflammatory language, scapegoating migrants and minority communities, in a calculated attempt to stoke fear and resentment for political gain.

 

Brent is one of the most diverse boroughs in the UK. Over many decades, people from across the globe – from South Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and beyond – have made their home here, contributing immensely to our local economy, public services, cultural life, and social fabric. Whether as NHS workers, teachers, carers, builders, artists, entrepreneurs, or community leaders, migrants have played a vital role in shaping modern Brent into the vibrant, resilient, and forward-looking borough it is today.

 

This Council believes:

 

·         Racism, xenophobia, and all forms of bigotry must be challenged wherever and whenever they arise, including when they come from mainstream or elected political figures.

 

·            The demonisation of immigrants and refugees not only undermines social cohesion but also endangers the safety and well-being of residents across Brent.

 

·            Brent’s diversity is not a challenge to be managed, but a strength to be celebrated.

 

Brent has always been stronger because of its diversity – not in spite of it. At a time when fear and hatred are being weaponised in national discourse, we in Brent choose a different path: one of solidarity, mutual respect.

 

As a result, this Council resolves to:

 

(1)       Proudly reaffirm Brent's commitment to being an inclusive, anti-racist borough through our affirmed status as a Borough of Sanctuary and a proud signatory of the Unison Anti-Racism Charter, where all residents – regardless of background, nationality, or immigration status – are welcomed, valued, and protected.

 

(2)       Publicly condemn the racist and xenophobic rhetoric being spread by Reform UK and other groups on the far/right and make clear that such divisive narratives have no place in our borough or our politics.

 

(3)       Celebrate the contributions of immigrants to Brent, through public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational initiatives that promote understanding, solidarity, and historical awareness as part of the Council’s refreshed approach to EDI, and as historically celebrated during Brent’s Borough of Culture status in 2020.

 

(4)       Encourage all councillors and community leaders to speak out against hate speech and misinformation targeting migrants and to work proactively to build unity across all of Brent’s communities.

 

(5)       Continue to support migrant and refugee communities through council services, advocacy, and partnerships with local organisations working on inclusion, integration, and support; as well as working to close the health inequality gaps exposed in the 2020 Brent Poverty Commission through initiatives such as Brent Health Matters.”

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Benea for moving the amendment before inviting other members to speak, with the following contributions received.

 

In opening the debate, Councillor Mistry felt it important to acknowledge that the original motion appeared to reflect the national mood rather than the specific situation in Brent welcoming the borough's vibrant, multi-ethnic character and decades of peaceful coexistence between various diverse communities.  At the same time, however, concerns were outlined in relation to the impact the influx of recent economic migrants arriving via unsafe channel crossings were having in terms of the asylum system and pressures being experienced across Brent in relation to the supply of temporary housing accommodation.  In clarifying that the position adopted was not aimed at demonising migrants or refugees but in seeking transparency and accountability in relation to what the Conservative Group felt was a failing asylum system, she highlighted a need for compassion to be matched by capacity, warning that not addressing the strain on housing risked further undermining social cohesion.

 

As a further contribution, Councillor Mili Patel, in providing historical context to the debate referred to an article in the Daily Mail from the 1930’s reacting to the Kindertransport which had saved thousands of Jewish children from Nazi persecution which had argued government policy at the time should not be “ruled by misguided sentimentalism”.  Reference was also made to the proposals in the 1970s offering refugees funds to settle elsewhere or provide alternative options for resettlement following the displacement of many East African Asians who were left homeless by regimes led by the likes of Idi Amin.  As a contrast Councillor Mili Patel felt it important to recognise that Brent had hugely benefitted from the migration and assimilation of many of these migrant communities, with it pointed out that many of those currently serving as councillors would not be here if steps had not been taken to accept refugees fleeing persecution.  It was therefore with disappointment that she felt the subject presented for the Non Cabinet Member debate later on the agenda had been framed in a way which looked at migration as an insurmountable challenge rather than a celebration of how it had contributed to the development and history of Brent.  In thanking the Liberal Democrats Group for the original motion and support of the amendments moved, it was felt this would assist in placing humanity back at the centre of a national conversation spiralling out of control, recognising the impact on those affected and fact that Brent had been stronger because of its diversity, not in spite of it.  In ending, Councillor Mili Patel advised she was therefore proud of the work being undertaken by the Council to support refugees who had chosen to make Brent their home with Brent continuing to be a place of sanctuary and seeking to treat all residents with the respect and dignity deserved rather than supporting what was felt to be the current dangerous and divisive rhetoric when it came to migration.

 

As a final contribution, Councillor Clinton then spoke in support of the motion and amendments moved by Councillor Benea also highlighting a need for political leadership against racism, hate, and division, which he was pleased to note many different members of the local community had recognised as unacceptable behaviour.

 

At this stage, the Mayor advised that the time limit allocated for debate on the motion had been reached.  In drawing the debate to a close, he therefore invited Councillor Lorber (as mover of the original motion) followed by Councillor Benea (as mover of the amendment) to exercise their right of reply.

 

On the basis of the debate and amendment moved having been accepted, both Councillor Lorber and Benea advised they did not wish to exercise a right of reply.

 

Having thanked members for their contributions the Mayor then advised that as the amendment moved by the Labour Group had been accepted, he would move straight to the vote on the substantive motion (as amended)

 

The Mayor then moved on to put the substantive motion, as amended, to a vote which was declared unanimously CARRIED.

 

It was therefore RESOLVED to approve the following motion:

 

“Standing United against Racism and Xenophobia in Brent

 

In recent years, particularly after the Brexit referendum, there has been a disturbing rise in racist and xenophobic rhetoric in public discourse, much of it amplified by political parties and figures on the far right and reactionary elements who seek to divide our communities. These groups have used inflammatory language, scapegoating migrants and minority communities, in a calculated attempt to stoke fear and resentment for political gain.

 

Brent is one of the most diverse boroughs in the UK. Over many decades, people from across the globe – from South Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and beyond – have made their home here, contributing immensely to our local economy, public services, cultural life, and social fabric. Whether as NHS workers, teachers, carers, builders, artists, entrepreneurs, or community leaders, migrants have played a vital role in shaping modern Brent into the vibrant, resilient, and forward-looking borough it is today.

 

This Council believes:

 

•       Racism, xenophobia, and all forms of bigotry must be challenged wherever and whenever they arise, including when they come from mainstream or elected political figures.

 

•       The demonisation of immigrants and refugees not only undermines social cohesion but also endangers the safety and well-being of residents across Brent.

 

•       Brent’s diversity is not a challenge to be managed, but a strength to be celebrated.

 

Brent has always been stronger because of its diversity – not in spite of it. At a time when fear and hatred are being weaponised in national discourse, we in Brent choose a different path: one of solidarity, mutual respect.

 

As a result, this Council resolves to:

 

(1)    Proudly reaffirm Brent's commitment to being an inclusive, anti-racist borough through our affirmed status as a Borough of Sanctuary and a proud signatory of the Unison Anti-Racism Charter, where all residents – regardless of background, nationality, or immigration status – are welcomed, valued, and protected.

 

(2)    Publicly condemn the racist and xenophobic rhetoric being spread by Reform UK and other groups on the far/right and make clear that such divisive narratives have no place in our borough or our politics.

 

(3)    Celebrate the contributions of immigrants to Brent, through public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational initiatives that promote understanding, solidarity, and historical awareness as part of the Council’s refreshed approach to EDI, and as historically celebrated during Brent’s Borough of Culture status in 2020.

 

(4)    Encourage all councillors and community leaders to speak out against hate speech and misinformation targeting migrants and to work proactively to build unity across all of Brent’s communities.

 

(5)    Continue to support migrant and refugee communities through council services, advocacy, and partnerships with local organisations working on inclusion, integration, and support; as well as working to close the health inequality gaps exposed in the 2020 Brent Poverty Commission through initiatives such as Brent Health Matters.”

 

10.3  3rd Motion (Labour Group) – Backing healthy, sustainable high streets in Brent

 

The Mayor then invited Councillor Agha to move the first motion submitted by the Labour Group.  In moving the motion, Councillor Agha began by highlighting what he regarded to be the key duty of a local authority in seeking to protect and deliver for its residents by building long standing, sustainable communities.  As such, he advised the motion had been designed to recognise the importance of high streets at the heart of local communities, providing essential services, creating local employment, and serving as places where residents were able to meet and connect as well as providing a reflection of the communities served in terms of their character and way in which they represented the diverse and vibrant mix of businesses across the borough.  Concern was, however, expressed at the impact being felt across many high streets as a result of the previous Government’s programme of austerity, with many businesses struggling as a result of rising costs and the proliferation of certain types of businesses such as fast food outlets and adult gaming centres taking their place.  As a result, he pointed out the motion was proposing action designed to redress the balance and place power and pride back at the heart of local communities recognising the need to prioritise the safety and health of residents and ensure businesses were able to feed back into the local economy.  In recognising the responsibility on the Council to act, the current constraints on them being able to do so were also highlighted, which the motion had sought to address. In summing up, Councillor Agha therefore expressed his pride in working with colleagues to not only call for a change in the law on gambling premises but to ensure that local residents voices were also heard in seeking to tackle the unsustainable clusters of businesses currently appearing across specific high streets in the borough, enhancing the Local Plan and establishing a dedicated multi-agency task force to crack down on unlawful activity in support the borough’s independent businesses and as part of the process in building a fairer, more resilient future for Brent.

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Agha for moving the motion before inviting other members to speak, with the following contributions received.

 

In opening the debate, Councillor Hirani supported the need to recognise the importance of thriving healthy high streets but expressed concern to avoid initiatives such as the dedicated new multi-agency taskforces and other interventions leading to the imposition of additional unnecessary costs, creating inefficiencies, and diverting resources from existing frontline services.  Whilst highlighting the Conservative Groups support for the motion, the opportunity was taken to advocate for a more balanced approach which, whilst designed to support local enterprise, would also ensure public funds were being used effectively.  As examples, reference was made to the potential adoption of a one-hour free parking scheme in town centres (as had successfully been adopted across Harrow), reduction of business rates and enforcement against illegal trading as measures that would provide an immediate impact in supporting local businesses and high streets, with implementation being funded through the collection of appropriate fines through enforcement action.  In highlighting the work being undertaken in collaboration with the Kenton Traders Association in terms of the type of support that could be provided, it was hoped (in supporting the vision identified within the motion) that consideration would also be given to the measures outlined during implementation.

 

Councillor Ethapemi, also spoke in support of the motion, endorsing the comments made by Councillor Agha and supporting the concerns raised about the impact being created by the proliferation of gambling premises on the borough’s high streets and surrounding areas and communities.

 

As a further contribution, Councillor Johnson (also speaking in support of the motion) also highlighted the importance in ensuring the views of local residents and the communities represented were fully reflected within the approach adopted towards supporting the boroughs high streets and tackling the harm being created by gambling.  Expressing pride at the proactive lead being taken by Brent nationally in seeking to highlight and tackle the harm being created by the proliferation of gambling premises across the borough, he was keen to support the call being made as a result for the Government to provide local authorities with the necessary power to control the provision of these types of premises on high streets, ensuring residents had a real say over their local environment.  In addition, support was expressed for the proposed focus on review of the Local Plan to strengthen policies that would limit over-concentration of uses like adult gaming centres and fast-food outlets while also protecting green spaces.  Reference was also made to the proposals outlined within the motion to explore new and innovative ways to support and promote legitimate local businesses in terms of the targeting of business grants, skills training and marketing campaigns with the overall approach also supported by the proposed development of a Brent Hight Streets Charter in offering a shared vision for safe, clean and vibrant high streets.  In highlighting the support also expressed for the approach outlined by Dawn Bulter as a local MP in Parliament he ended by expressing hope that the campaign and lobbying being led by Brent working with the Social Market Foundation in relation to the harm created by gambling premises on local communities would have the necessary impact in terms of the urgent reform being sought.

 

As a final contribution, Councillor Mistry also spoke highlighting concern at the impact of the current parking restrictions on local businesses in town centres across the borough when compared with the approach adopted by other Council’s, such as Harrow, in introducing a free parking period given the benefits experienced by local businesses. Whilst supporting the motion, she therefore hoped members would also recognise the need to consider and address the issue as part of the overall approach outlined in seeking to support the borough’s high streets and local businesses.

 

At this stage, as the time limit for debate had been reached, the Mayor then invited Councillor Agha to exercise his right of reply.  In thanking members for their support and comments, Councillor Agha ended by once again highlighting his support for the proposals within the motion including establishment of a dedicated multi-agency taskforce to actively identify and take action against businesses operating illegally and calls for a change in the law on gambling premises to ensure that local residents voices were also heard in seeking to tackle the unsustainable clusters of those type of businesses appearing across the borough and in order foster a supportive environment in which business could flourish supported by their local communities.

 

Having thanked all members for their contributions, the Mayor then moved to put the motion to a vote which was declared unanimously CARRIED.

 

It was therefore RESOLVED to approve the following motion:

 

“Backing healthy, sustainable high streets in Brent

 

This council notes:

 

•       That our high streets and local town centres are the heart of our communities, providing essential services, employment, and social spaces for Brent residents.

 

•       That a diverse and vibrant mix of businesses, from independent shops to established retailers, is crucial for the economic and social well-being of the borough.

 

•       That the proliferation of fast-food outlets and the rise of cash-intensive businesses, alongside high concentrations of Adult Gaming Centres, can impact the character of our high streets, create unfair competition for legitimate traders, and pose risks to public health, safety, and consumer welfare.

 

•       That Brent Council has a responsibility to protect its residents and support the growth of a sustainable and prosperous local economy.

 

•       That Brent Council is already taking a leading role in this fight, having partnered with over 40 local and combined authorities to lobby central government for urgent gambling reform, and working with the Social Market Foundation to research the true impact of these businesses on our communities.

 

This council believes:

 

•       That a proactive approach is needed to foster a supportive environment for legitimate businesses to flourish.

 

•       That clamping down on illegal and illicit trading activities is essential to creating a level playing field for all businesses and to safeguard our communities.

 

•       That strong collaboration between the Council, local businesses, residents, and the police is key to tackling these issues effectively.

 

This council resolves:

 

(1)    To develop and implement a Brent High Streets Charter in consultation with local business groups and residents, outlining a shared vision for safe, clean, and vibrant high streets and our ambition to declutter inaccessible spaces.

 

(2)    To establish a dedicated multi-agency task force, including officers from Trading Standards, Licensing, the police and other law enforcement agencies, to actively identify and take action against businesses that operate illegally, sell counterfeit goods, or engage in other illicit activities.

 

(3)    To review and, if necessary, amend Brent’s Local Plan to ensure a more balanced and diverse mix of businesses on our high streets, with a particular focus on addressing the over-concentration of certain types of businesses, such as takeaways and adult gaming centres.

 

(4)    To explore local measures to deal with high-risk cash businesses, to address any risk of financial crime and/or community harm.

 

(5)    To explore new and innovative ways to support and promote our borough's legitimate businesses, including targeted business grants, skills training, and marketing campaigns.

 

(6)    To launch a public awareness campaign to inform residents about the dangers of using illicit services and purchasing illegal products such as disposable vapes and snus, and to encourage them to report suspicious business activities.

 

(7)    To contribute to the Mayor of London’s Plan for London consultation, feeding Brent’s voice into the future of the capital’s high streets.”

 

10.4  4th Motion (Labour Group) – Breathing new life into Brent’s transport infrastructure projects

 

The Mayor then invited Councillor Lesley Smith to move the second and final motion submitted by the Labour Group.  In moving the motion, Councillor Lesley Smith advised that she had originally settled in Brent as a result of the Bakerloo line, which she had used ever since and with the local businesses which had flourished around Queen’s Park station also demonstrating its strength as a commuter starting point and attracting people to the borough.  In highlighting the impact which the Bakerloo line had had in transforming Queen’s Park as a destination, the opportunity was taken to recognise the number of young people now arriving to use the various cafes, bars and other facilities in the area delivering jobs and prosperity.  Brent was also noted to have more Bakerloo stations (ten) than any other borough located within its area, running from Kilburn Park to Kenton but in recognising this fact it was also felt more could be done in terms of the service provided.  Referring to the stock used on the line being some of the oldest on the Underground and operated in the UK, issues were identified in terms of the lack of air conditioning and its general maintenance with the motion therefore highlighting support for the announcement of the latest TfL settlement provided by the Chancellor in seeking to make new rolling stock a reality and to extend the line in order to spread its benefits beyond their current reach.

 

In moving the motion the opportunity was also taken to express support for the funding required to deliver West London Orbital, given the difference it would bring not only to Brent but also across the wider West London region in terms of providing access for up to half a million people to the new station at Old Oak Common as well as supporting the creation of up to 39,000 jobs and 22,000 homes across Brent Cross, Wembley, and Cricklewood.  This would be in addition to the benefits created in terms of reducing car use and emissions and in support of providing new step-free access to Neasden and Harlesden stations and elsewhere in the borough, something it highlighted as also needed in Queen’s Park.  In summing up, confirmation was also provided that the amendment submitted by the Liberal Democrats Group in support of the urgent upgrade identified as required to the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly line (in order to ensure this met the same standard as the Heathrow branch) was also supported as part of a coordinated approach in seeking to meet the needs of residents across Brent.

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Lesley Smith for moving the motion and then drew members attention to the amendment submitted by Councillor Clinton on behalf of the Liberal Democrats Group, as previously referred to and circulated in advance of the meeting.

 

In moving the amendment, Councillor Clinton began by thanking the Councillor Lesley Smith for bringing forward the original motion and confirming the acceptance of his amendment which, whilst also supportive of the upgrade being sought to the Bakerloo line and commitment to West London Orbital, had been designed to highlight the case in support of upgrading the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly as another critical transport link within the borough.  In highlighting his personal experience of the poor reliability of the service on that branch of the Piccadilly line along with increasing demand on the existing service, given the level of development in the surrounding area, Councillor Clinton ended by outlining what he felt was the need to ensure provision of an expanded, resilient and interconnected transport network for residents across the borough regardless of which line they used and once again thanked the Labour Group for their support of the changes outlined within his amendment.

 

On this basis the amendment moved by Councillor Clinton was as follows:

 

To add the wording underlined and delete the wording indicated:

 

“Breathing new life into Brent’s transport infrastructure projects

 

This Council notes:

 

·            That a robust and integrated transport network is fundamental to the economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, and social well-being of Brent's residents.

 

·            The significant challenges posed by climate change and the urgent need to transition to more sustainable modes of transport, reducing reliance on private cars.

 

·            The Government’s £2.2bn multi-year capital funding settlement to Transport for London TfL earlier this year, which made note of support for high priority new rolling stock and signalling procurements on the Bakerloo Line.

 

·            That both the proposed Bakerloo Line Extension and the West London Orbital (WLO) projects have been identified as key strategic transport schemes that would deliver transformative benefits for Brentand the wider region.

 

·            The compelling economic case for both projects, delivering on tens of thousands of new homes and jobs, and unlocking growth in key areas across the borough. and beyond, including creative and cultural hubs in Park Royal and Soho.

 

·            That reports estimate upgrading the Bakerloo line will create capacity for an additional increase capacity by 150,000 daily journeys, connecting some of London’s least served areas to the TfL network.

 

·            That the Council has already demonstrated its commitment to the West London Orbital, WLO having approved with a contribution of £465,516 plus a £150,000 contingency from its Strategic Community Infrastructure Levy to fund the next stage of its development, in collaboration with the West London Alliance.

 

·            That the upcoming Autumn Budget presents an crucial opportunity for the Government to demonstrate its commitment to investing in strategic transport infrastructure.

 

·            The poor reliability of tube services and the lack of night tubes on the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly line.

 

·            The thousands of (much needed) flats being built on that branch, increasing demand on existing services.

 

This Council believes:

 

·            The Bakerloo & Picadilly lines are Line is critical transport links an iconic part of London’s underground, its history, and culture, connecting landmarks from Wembley to the West End and beyond.

 

·            The West London Orbital WLO is a crucial, shovel-ready rail link that would connect strategic growth areas in West and North West NWLondon, providing a sustainable transport corridor, reducing congestion on local roads, and offering our residents new, direct journey opportunities.

 

·            The combined delivery of both projects, and improvements to tube services would create a resilient and interconnected transport network that serves the needs of our current residents and supports the sustainable growth of our borough for decades to come.

 

·            The delivery of these projects aligns with the Labour Government's policy of creating a unified, simplified, and publicly accountable rail network, as outlined in its commitment to establish Great British Railways.

 

This Council resolves:

 

(1)       To formally and unequivocally support the delivery of both the Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension and the West London Orbital WLO projects.

 

(2)  To ask the Leader of the Council to write to the Mayor of London, the Secretary of State for Transport and the Chancellor to express Brent’s strong support, and to urge the Government to use the upcoming Autumn Budget to deliver on its rail commitments and prioritise funding for these critical projects.

 

(3)       To commit to working collaboratively with Transport for London TfL and other partners to ensure that Brent's interests are at the forefront of the planning and implementation of these schemes, including additional lobbying on providing for step-free access at transport stations across the borough.

 

(4)       To also ask the Leader of the Council to write to the Mayor requesting:

 

o      Services on the Uxbridge branch line be on par with the Heathrow Branch

 

o      The extension of the night tubes to the Uxbridge branch.”

 

The Mayor thanked Councillor Clinton for moving the amendment before inviting other members to speak, with the following contributions received.

 

Speaking in support of the motion, Councillor Kennelly, in opening the debate outlined what he felt was the importance of the Bakerloo line extension as a key strategic transport scheme that would be able to deliver transformative benefits not only to the economy in Brent but also the wider region.  Whilst welcoming the Government’s TfL funding settlement and priority for new rolling stock and signalling along the existing line, he also supported what he regarded as the compelling economic case presented for extension of the line and in ending also expressed support for the amendment moved highlighting the need for improved services on the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly line, given the impact this would also have on Brent residents, including himself, served by that line.

 

As a further contribution, Councillor Maurice also spoke advising that whilst supportive of the improvement and upgrade of public transport, he felt this needed to be undertaken on the basis of need and funding having also been identified.  Querying the direct benefits of the proposed Bakerloo Line extension, specifically within Brent, he felt the main advantage to be provided would be in terms of the provision of new rolling stock (recognising the ageing nature of the current stock) and signalling improvements. Whilst welcoming the benefits associated with West London Orbital, Councillor Maurice identified what he felt to be a significant issue in terms of the new station at Brent Cross West having been designed and built without provision for WLO.  Recognising that TfL was also in a process of financial recovery, he ended by highlighting the significant lobbying that he felt would still be required to attract the necessary support and funding for the expansion of the Bakerloo line and improvements also being sought, through the amendment, to the Picadilly line which he pointed out had always been prioritised on the basis of access to Heathrow.

 

As a final contribution Councillor Nevra, also speaking in support of the motion, felt it was important to respond to the issues raised by Councillor Maurice in terms of the importance of the improvements being sought to both the Bakerloo and Picadilly line by residents relying on those services and living in the surrounding areas, recognising not only the compelling economic case but also wider impacts in relation to environmental sustainability, social well-being and wider transport connectivity.  In welcoming the near unanimous cross party support expressed during the debate, he hoped all members would support the motion (as amended) in seeking to secure the necessary commitment to both the upgrade and expansion of the Bakerloo line and enhancements to the Picadilly line in terms of the prioritisation by the government for funding to deliver these critical projects.

 

At this stage, the Mayor advised that the time limit allocated for debate on the motion had been reached.  In drawing the debate to a close, he therefore invited Councillor Lesley Smith (as mover of the original motion) followed by Councillor Clinton (as mover of the amendment) to exercise their right of reply.

 

In thanking members for their support, Councillor Lesley Smith (in exercising her right of reply) felt it important to challenge the comments made by Councillor Maurice on behalf of the Conservative Group during the debate, highlighting the significant benefits it was felt the expansion and upgrade of the Bakerloo line and improvements being sought in the service along the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly line would deliver within Brent in terms of new homes, jobs, being able to unlock additional growth and prosperity and attract additional interest and investment from outside the borough given the range of areas served by the stations along both lines across the borough.  Whilst recognising the extensive lobbying required to secure the necessary investment and ensure Brent’s interests were at the forefront in terms of the delivery of these schemes as key strategic transport infrastructure projects, she felt confident the approach outlined in the motion and amendment would support this process backed by the commitment, investment and support already provided by the Council and cross party support also highlighted, and as such hoped all members would support both the motion and amendment as moved.

 

On the basis of the debate and amendment having been accepted, Councillor Clinton advised that he did not wish to exercise any right of reply.

 

Having thanked members for their contributions the Mayor once again advised that as the Labour Group had indicated there were in acceptance of the amendment moved by the Liberal Democrats Group he would move straight to the vote on the substantive motion (as amended). The Mayor then moved on to put the substantive motion, as amended, to a vote which was declared CARRIED.

 

It was therefore RESOLVED to approve the following motion:

 

“Breathing new life into Brent’s transport infrastructure projects

 

This Council notes:

 

•       That a robust transport network is fundamental to the economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, and social well-being of Brent's residents.

 

•       The significant challenges posed by climate change and the urgent need to transition to more sustainable modes of transport, reducing reliance on private cars.

 

•       The Government’s £2.2bn multi-year funding settlement to TfL earlier this year, which made note of support for high priority new rolling stock and signalling procurements on the Bakerloo Line.

 

•       That both the Bakerloo Line Extension and the WLO projects have been identified as key transport schemes that would deliver transformative benefits for Brent.

 

•       The compelling economic case for both projects, delivering tens of thousands of new homes and jobs, and unlocking growth across the borough.

 

•       That reports estimate upgrading the Bakerloo line will increase capacity by 150,000 daily journeys, connecting some of London’s least served areas to the TfL network.

 

•       That the Council has demonstrated its commitment to the WLO with a contribution of £465,516 plus a £150,000 contingency from its Strategic Community Infrastructure Levy to fund the next stage of its development, in collaboration with the West London Alliance.

 

•       That the Autumn Budget presents an opportunity for the Government to demonstrate its commitment to investing in strategic transport infrastructure.

 

•       The poor reliability of tube services and the lack of night tubes on the Uxbridge branch of the Picadilly line.

 

•       The thousands of (much needed) flats being built on that branch, increasing demand on existing services.

 

This Council believes:

 

•         The Bakerloo & Picadilly lines are critical transport links.

 

•       The WLO is a crucial rail link that would connect growth areas in West and NWLondon, providing sustainable transport, reducing congestion on local roads, and offering our residents new, direct journey opportunities.

 

•       The combined delivery of both projects, and improvements to tube services would create a resilient and interconnected transport network that serves the needs of our current residents and supports the sustainable growth of our borough.

 

•       The delivery of these projects aligns with the Labour Government's policy of creating a unified, simplified, and publicly accountable rail network, as outlined in its commitment to establish Great British Railways.

 

This Council resolves:

 

(1)    To unequivocally support the delivery of both the Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension and the WLO projects.

 

(2)    To ask the Leader of the Council to write to the Mayor of London, the Secretary of State for Transport and the Chancellor to express Brent’s strong support, and to urge the Government to use the Autumn Budget to deliver on its rail commitments and prioritise funding for these projects.

 

(3)    To work with TfL and other partners to ensure Brent's interests are at the forefront of the planning and implementation of these schemes, including lobbying for step-free access at stations across the borough.

 

(4)    To also ask the Leader of the Council to write to the Mayor requesting:

 

o      Services on the Uxbridge branch line be on par with the Heathrow Branch

 

o      The extension of the night tubes to the Uxbridge branch.”