Agenda item

This report details the Council’s use and conduct of surveillance techniques in accordance with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000 in compliance with the annual review obligations set out in Brent Council’s RIPA policy and procedures.

Biancia Robinson, Senior Constitutional & Governance Lawyer, introduced a report providing an update on the Council’s use and conduct of surveillance techniques in accordance with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) and in compliance with the annual review obligations within the Council’s RIPA policy and procedures.

In considering the report the Committee noted:

·             The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) gave the Council significant powers to investigate serious matters and offences, enabling the Council to use covert surveillance, covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) and to acquire service user or subscriber information in relation to communications data.

·             The Council was periodically inspected by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO). Brent’s last inspection was in March 2020 with members advised of the change in process introduced since then involving an initial written assessment provided by each local authority on compliance with the relevant legislation, tacking account of the general decrease in the use of covert powers by many authorities.  Brent had been required to provide its initial written assessment in July 2023 with the IPCO confirming in August 2023 they were satisfied with the assurance provided in relation to the Council’s compliance and would not require any further inspection during the current year.

·             The outcome of the annual review of RIPA policy and procedures which, whilst not identifying the need for any substantive changes, had resulted in a number of proposed minor amendments to reflect changes made in the Council’s organisational management structure as detailed within Appendix A of the report.

·             The ongoing decline in use of RIPA over recent years, with zero RIPA Directed Surveillance or Covert Human Intelligence Source (CHIS) authorisations in Brent during 2023-24 and twenty requests (all pending applications in relation to three separate investigations) for Communications Data, as detailed within section 3 of the report.  Members were advised that the predominant use of RIPA remained focussed on the enforcement of trading standards controls and in the context of serious fraud investigations.

The Committee was then invited to raise questions on the report, which are summarised below:

·             In response to a query on the use of facial recognition technology, members were advised that this type of technology would not fall within the scope of RIPA requirements.

·             Further detail was also sought on the reasons for the decline in use of directed surveillance and RIPA authorisations, which members were advised was linked to improvements in the use of alternative investigative methods, including the increased use of communications data, social media and data matching and availability of wider enforcement and fraud prevention powers.

·             In response to a Committee query regarding the thresholds to decide on making an application to use RIPA as opposed to alternative methods, it was confirmed that thresholds were high with significant prior intelligence needed to successfully support an application to the magistrates to use RIPA.

As there were no further comments raised the Chair thanked Biancia Robinson for the update and the Committee RESOLVED

(1)    To note the content of the report.

(2)    To note and approve the changes to the RIPA policies (as detailed in Appendix A of the report) to reflect the Council’s organisational change and the new Chief Executive as an Authorising Officer.