Logo Skip to content
Home
The council and democracy
Democracy portal

Agenda and minutes

Health and Wellbeing Board
Wednesday 16 March 2022 6.00 pm

  • Attendance details
  • Agenda frontsheet pdf icon PDF 380 KB
  • Agenda reports pack pdf icon PDF 9 MB
  • Printed minutes pdf icon PDF 253 KB

Venue: Conference Hall

Contact: Hannah O'Brien, Governance Officer  Tel: 020 8937 1339; Email: hannah.o'brien@brent.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies for absence and clarification of alternate members

For Members of the Board to note any apologies for absence.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 1.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from the following:

 

·         Gail Tolley (Strategic Director Children and Young People, Brent Council) substituted by Nigel Chapman

·         Simon Crawford (Deputy Chief Executive, LNWUHT) substituted by James Walters

·         Robyn Doran (Chief Operating Officer, CNWL)

·         Dr Ketana Halai (NWL CCG)

·         Councillor Farah

 

2.

Declarations of Interest

Members are invited to declare at this stage of the meeting, the nature and existence of any relevant disclosable pecuniary or personal interests in the items on this agenda and to specify the item(s) to which they relate.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 2.

Minutes:

None declared.

3.

Minutes of the previous meeting pdf icon PDF 427 KB

To approve the minutes of the previous meeting as a correct record.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 3.

Minutes:

RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting, held on 13 January 2022, be approved as an accurate record of the meeting, subject to a grammatical amendment to item 6, page 4.

 

4.

Matters arising (if any)

To consider any matters arising from the minutes of the previous meeting.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 4.

Minutes:

In relation to the action from the previous minutes for the Integrated Care Partnership (ICP) to write to NHSE encouraging them to allow more pharmacists to undertake vaccinations, the Board wanted to know whether the NHS had agreed to make use of local pharmacies. Dr Haidar advised that he was the vaccination lead in Brent and had been involved in the discussions with the Pharmacy Lead, lobbying on behalf of the ICP for community pharmacists to provide a vaccination service to Brent residents. He highlighted that the process to enable pharmacists to vaccinate was complex and there were particular protocols that needed to be followed including infection control measures, ensuring facilities were safe and residents received the vaccination in an appropriate environment. Dr Haidar had nominated 2 pharmacies and although the space was very small there was a desire to approve and support them to deliver the vaccination programme. The Pharmacy Lead had been in support of piloting first so that was being worked on.

 

Fana Hussain (Borough Lead Director – Brent, NWL CCG) added that NHSE were looking at all pharmacies in London as a whole, and going forward the assurance process would move to local teams. This was a very rigorous process to ensure protocols, training, adequate space, correct facilities and checks and balances were in place, including for vaccination storage. A number of pharmacies were going through that process and the ICP were supporting pharmacists and working with the Local Pharmaceutical Committee to look at what the requirements were and how they could support pharmacists with adjustments to meet the requirements. Dr Haidar acknowledged that vaccination uptake was low in the South of Brent and the system had continually worked together on ways to reach people, such as introducing a roving team to raise awareness of the vaccination, and would continue to use every opportunity to increase vaccination uptake.

 

5.

HealthWatch Work Plan Update pdf icon PDF 199 KB

To receive a progress update on the work plan from Brent HealthWatch.

Additional documents:

  • 5a. Appendix 1 - Patient Experience Report September - December 2021 , item 5. pdf icon PDF 491 KB
  • 5b. Appendix 2 - Identifying Young Carers in Substance Misuse Households – Review of Recommendations , item 5. pdf icon PDF 89 KB
  • Webcast for 5.

Minutes:

This item was deferred to a future meeting.

 

6.

Primary Care in Brent

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 6.

6a

Primary Care update pdf icon PDF 1 MB

For the Health and Wellbeing Board to receive an update on primary care in Brent.

 

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 6a

Minutes:

Fana Hussain (Borough Lead Director – Brent, NWL CCG) introduced the report, which detailed the priorities for primary care going forward, as defined by national, regional, North West London, and local priorities. It was recognised that during the pandemic years, when many services moved to remote, patients may not have come forward for a number of services provided by GP practices, and some services that the GP may have previously provided may not have been accessible. As a result, a priority was reaching those patients who may not have had contact with their GP for some time now that services were fully open. In particular, cervical smear tests and childhood immunisations continued to be a priority. SMI health checks for those with learning disabilities or mental health diagnoses was also a priority going forward. The paper detailed the work being done to recruit to the Additional Role Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) to support Primary Care Networks (PCNs).

 

The Chair thanked Fana Hussain for her update, adding that they were also using ARRS to support patients with their medication, following 6 years of clinical training. He invited comments and questions, with the following issues raised:

 

  • In relation to face to face services, the Board were advised that access to primary care existed whether virtual or face to face, and if patients wanted face to face that should be made available to them. The Integrated Care Partnership (ICP) had written to all practices and asked them to open their doors while maintaining infection control measures. The ICP had also commissioned Saturday morning clinics from a number of GP practices across all PCNs, with a focus on face to face in particular. Dr Haidar added that there was work to do alongside community services and the Brent Health Matters team to educate patients on which services to attend to best meet their needs, for example to avoid patients going to their GPs when their pharmacist was better equipped to provide a service. Brent Health Matters had been doing a lot of publicity around winter access including leaflets, social media campaigns and promoting the hours and telephone numbers of primary care services. Specifically in relation to group therapies, the Board were advised that CLCH were offering all their services face to face, or hybrid for families who preferred digital, as well as ensuring home services were offered face to face, with the exception of group sessions. Officers were working with the Medical Officer to understand the guidance and risk assessments to get groups running again.

 

  • In relation to the commissioning of ARRS by PCNs, the Board were advised that the role of ARRS was to help in the reduction of variation across primary care services and standardise care across the patch. They were available to all GP practices in a particular PCN but may be focused on one specific practice. For example, in one PCN there may be 4 GP practices varying between good, middle or poor standards, and so the additional resource from the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6a

6b

GP Access Scrutiny Task Group pdf icon PDF 153 KB

To receive the final findings and recommendations from the GP Access Scrutiny Task Group.

Additional documents:

  • 6bi. Appendix 1 - GP Access Task Group Final Report , item 6b pdf icon PDF 2 MB
  • Webcast for 6b

Minutes:

Councillor Mary Daly (Chair of the GP Access Scrutiny Task Group) introduced the report, which included the final findings and recommendations from the GP Access Scrutiny Task Group conducted by the Community and Wellbeing Scrutiny Committee. She highlighted that the report had been very customer focused in relation to access to primary care. One of the key takeaways had been issues experienced by patients around digital literacy and access to remote services, which had led to a recommendation that digital access and literacy was noted on patient records. Another learning point was that face to face was the preference for younger patients as well as older patients, and that parents of infants and young children, and children and young adults, felt neglected by primary care. Some parents who were unable to get a GP appointment for a sick child chose to go to A&E, spending a lot of time there. The Board were advised that only a handful of patients were dissatisfied with their consultation with a GP, and GPs and community pharmacists were highly valued. It was clear from the interviews conducted that patients did not want to attend A&E, and Councillor Daly highlighted the importance of patients being properly educated and directed to the best services to meet their needs.

 

The Chair thanked Councillor Daly for the update and invited members to comment, with the following issues raised:

 

·         The Board asked how the recommendations had been received by primary care and how they would be taken forward. The report had been discussed in forums and been looked at from the point of view of primary care. The recommendations had been critically appraised. The Board acknowledged the impact on primary care, particularly over the past two years. The work Councillor Daly and her colleagues had done had been put at the head of all other NWL boroughs, and the Integrated Care System (ICS) was committed to developing standards across the 8 boroughs for access. A number of investments had already been made, for example a cloud based telephone service which allowed a practice to divert calls, see their peak times and increase resource at demand. Digital platforms were also in the process of being re-procured to be more user friendly, such as allowing patients whose first language was not English to translate the website. From October, each PCN would have an access hub open weekdays from 6:30am to 8pm, and Saturdays from 9am to 5pm. It was the intention of the ICS to provide a response to each recommendation, once further details on investment for primary care in the coming year came through.

 

·         The Board drew a parallel between the GP Access paper and the Health and Wellbeing Strategy due to be presented during the meeting, in terms of the focus on health inequalities, specifically the recommendations that access should be looked at through a lens of deprivation, ethnicity and disability.

                                                             

·         The Board noted that the Community and Wellbeing Scrutiny Committee would expect a report on the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6b

6c

HealthWatch GP Survey

To inform the Health and Wellbeing Board about the HealthWatch GP Survey.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 6c

Minutes:

This item was deferred to a future meeting.

6d

Integrated Care Partnership update - Organisational Development Plan pdf icon PDF 1 MB

To receive an update in relation to the Integrated Care Partnership.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 6d

Minutes:

Tom Shakespeare (Director of Brent Integrated Care Partnership) introduced the update on the development of the Integrated Care Partnership (ICP). He highlighted that the ICP was an opportunity to put weight behind primary care as the frontline of the health service, and the paper explored how to embed primary care as leaders in the system. The recommendations in the paper had been produced following engagement with the ICP executive and PCN directors in the initial phase, which formed the first stage of the work. Those recommendations were; putting patients and citizens at the heart of joint working and re-establishing a joint vision driven by primary care; reaffirming shared delivery commitments and looking at the work streams that had been developed with the ICP, primary care, and community; championing a person-centred approach; exploring the support and wraparound services community health and social care could provide within primary care; focusing on ARRS roles; addressing health inequalities; and improving recruitment and retention. The ICP were also looking at how to hold itself to account and develop a shared culture, building awareness in the community across all service areas such as how to access services, what services were available, and addressing the GP access scrutiny recommendations.

 

The Chair invited comments and questions from those present, with the following issues raised:

 

·         The Chair invited Councillor Daly to contribute to the meeting. She asked what the relationship was with Health Education England in introducing pharmacists, nurses and paramedics into primary care as part of their training during their student period. The Chair advised that there were programmes working with secondary care for training, which GPs helped with, similarly with pharmacists and physicians, supported by Health Education England. The ICP had a Training Hub Lead working hard to encourage GPs to take on student nurses and train them, although there was a workforce issue whereby there were not enough GPs to be released to become educators. The ICP were aware of this and were taking on the challenge as a system. There were also challenges with taking on paramedics in primary care, where the ICP had been asked not to recruit paramedics due to demand in acute and ambulance services. Going forward, the aim was for paramedics to take on a dual role working with the acute trust and GP practices, which was being planned with Health Education England. Basu Lamichaane (Brent Nursing and Residential Care Sector) advised that there were care homes in Brent providing nursing placements with the University of West London and 200 nurses had been supported through that scheme with very good feedback. It was agreed Basu could be put in touch with the Training Hub Manager to look into how this scheme could be further utilised. Dr Melanie Smith (Director of Public Health, Brent Council) highlighted that Health Education England worked to national levels which was less flexible than it could be, but hoped that the work the Integrated Care System (ICS) were doing, with its larger influence, would be a way  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6d

7.

Vaccinations pdf icon PDF 261 KB

To receive an update from the Director of Public Health in relation to UK immunisation and vaccination programmes.

Additional documents:

  • 7a. Appendix 1 - Vaccinations , item 7. pdf icon PDF 277 KB
  • Webcast for 7.

Minutes:

Dr Melanie Smith (Director of Public Health, Brent Council) first updated the Board in relation to Covid-19, as at the time of the meeting. She advised that the rates of Covid-19 infection were increasing locally, across London, and nationally, although it was becoming more difficult to interpret the rates as measured by testing as it became less accepted and people prepared for testing to be unavailable from the following month. The Public Health Team had been paying attention to the ONS survey figures, which were reliable but only gave London figures rather than Brent figures. Both the testing figures and ONS figures showed approximately 4.4% of the population in London had Covid-19 at the time of the meeting which the Board were advised was very high, with increases across all age groups. Locally, the NHS was not being significantly impacted, because the vaccination had broken the link between infection and severe disease. Dr Melanie Smith advised that Public Health experts would have predicted this increase as society opened up and people began to mix. It was critical to monitor the impact on hospitalisation in terms of how sick people were from Covid-19 in hospital.

 

James Walters (Deputy Chief Operating Officer, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust) explained that in LWNUHT the number of Covid-19 inpatients had increased, but the number of incidental findings was around 40%. These were patients whose primary presenting health complaint was not Covid-19, so would have otherwise been in hospital but happened to have Covid-19. A & E was exceptionally busy across the whole of NWL, putting pressure on each of those services, for example how patients’ urgent and emergency care needs were managed while maintaining infection control and prevention. Those in hospital who happened to have Covid-19 were not making their way to the High Dependency Unit or Critical Care in the way patients with Covid-19 were previously.

 

Regarding the vaccination programme, Dr Melanie Smith highlighted that achieving vaccine equity in Brent was a challenge, but the vaccination programme had shown how the system could work together, be innovative and develop solutions with communities. There was no desire to continue doing things the way they had been done in the past, and the paper asked the Board to take the lessons learnt from Covid-19 specifically in relation to inequalities. The new approach would involve working with communities to co-produce solutions, and take that learning and apply it to other programmes such as the childhood immunisation programme. There would be a need to develop new KPIs in order for the system to hold itself to account on performance for inequalities and the Board was asked to assist with that. The Board strongly supported Dr Melanie Smith’s suggestions and hoped those conversations would take place at an ICP and ICS level, with any proposals brought back to the Health and Wellbeing Board.

 

The Chair invited comments and questions from those present, with the following issues raised:

 

·         The Board noted the increase in Covid-19 infections in Brent, with  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

8.

Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy pdf icon PDF 187 KB

To receive the final Health and Wellbeing Strategy for approval.

Additional documents:

  • 8a. Appendix 1 - Brent Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy (Draft for Approval) , item 8. pdf icon PDF 3 MB
  • Webcast for 8.

Minutes:

The Board were presented with the final Health and Wellbeing Strategy following the consultation process and asked to approve the final draft. The Board thanked all those involved in devoting their time to the engagement process and thanked Anne Kittappa (Senior Policy Officer, Brent Council) and HealthWatch in pulling the work together.

 

RESOLVED: to approve the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy (JHWS).

 

9.

Any other urgent business

Notice of items to be raised under this heading must be given in writing to the Head of Executive and Member Services or his representative before the meeting in accordance with Standing Order 60.

Additional documents:

  • Webcast for 9.

Minutes:

None.

 

Navigation

  • Agenda for Health and Wellbeing Board on Wednesday 16 March 2022, 6.00 pm
  • What's new
  • Committees
  • Constitution
  • Calendar
  • Meetings
  • Committee decisions
  • Officer Decisions
  • Forward plans
  • Your Councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Election Results
  • Outside bodies
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
Brent homepage
Your council
Complaints and feedback Contact the council Jobs at the council News and Press office Sign up to our weekly email news updates
My Account
Manage your Council Tax, housing benefits, council rent account and more through My Account.
Sign in or register
Follow us on social
Brent Council's Facebook page Brent's Instagram page Brent Council's LinkedIn site Brent council's Twitter feed Brent council's YouTube channel
Accessibility statement Cookies policy Privacy policy Terms of use
© Copyright Brent Council 2022

Title