Issue - decisions

Mr Daniel Kneafsey speaking on behalf of his parents and in objection to the application stated that the proposed two-storey rear extension would lead to loss of light to their main living area and kitchen area thus forcing the family to rely more heavily on unnatural light. He added that the proposed development which would have a dominant effect on their lives would have a detrimental impact on their visual amenity.  He continued that the additional 2 bedrooms would lead to an increased demand for parking in a section of the road that was already over-crowded.  For the above reasons, Mr Kneafsey urged members to consider a site visit before deciding on the application.

During debate, Councillor Baker moved an amendment for a site visit which was put to the vote and declared carried.