Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, Brent Town Hall, Forty Lane, Wembley, HA9 9HD. View directions
Contact: Toby Howes, Senior Democratic Services Officer
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Personal and Prejudicial Interests (if any) Members are invited to declare at this stage of the meeting, any relevant financial or other interest in the items on this agenda. Decision: Councillor Thomas declared an interest in that Club Casa Nossa (items two and three in the agenda) was located in his ward and that he had received correspondence relating to these premises. However, he did not regard the interest as personal and remained in attendance when these items were referred to. Minutes: Councillor Thomas declared an interest in that Club Casa Nossa (items two and three in the agenda) was located in his ward and that he had received correspondence relating to these premises. However, he did not regard the interest as personal and remained in attendance when these items were referred to. |
|
Application by Club Casa Nossa for a variation of the premises license for Club Casa Nossa (75 Park Parade, Harlesden, NW10 4JB) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 Decision: The sub-committee was informed that the application had been withdrawn prior to hearing this case and accordingly this matter did not need to be considered.
Minutes: The sub-committee was informed that the application had been withdrawn prior to hearing this case and accordingly this matter did not need to be considered.
|
|
Application by Club Casa Nossa to vary the designated premises supervisor for Club Casa Nossa (75 Park Parade, London, NW10 4TB) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 Decision: The sub-committee was informed that there had been no relevant representations submitted within the due notice period and accordingly this matter did not need to be considered.
Minutes: The sub-committee was informed that there had been no relevant representations submitted within the due notice period and accordingly this matter did not need to be considered.
|
|
Application by Mohammed Munir Chughtai for a variation of the premises licence for NW Bar (61 Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QR) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 Decision: that the application by Mohammed Munir Chugtai for a variation of the premises licence for ‘NW Bar’ (61 Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QR) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) heard that the applicant was unable to attend the hearing due to a bereavement in his family and had requested that the application be adjourned. In accordance with Paragraph 20 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005, the Sub-committee has the power to adjourn the proceedings where it is considered necessary to be in the public interest to do so. In arriving at its decision the Sub-committee gave considerable weight to the public interest test, having regard to the rules of natural justice and the applicant’s right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention on human rights pursuant to the The Human Rights Act 1998. In light of the exceptional circumstances put forward it was necessary for the Sub-committee to strike the right balance between the parties so that neither party was adversely prejudiced by delay. On that basis , the sub-committee felt it was just and reasonable in the circumstances to adjourn the application
The sub-committee advised the applicant’s representative at the meeting that should the applicant fail to attend the rescheduled hearing for whatever reason, the application would be heard in his absence.
Minutes: that the application by Mohammed Munir Chugtai for a variation of the premises licence for ‘NW Bar’ (61 Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QR) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) heard that the applicant was unable to attend the hearing due to a bereavement in his family and had requested that the application be adjourned. In accordance with Paragraph 20 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005, the Sub-committee has the power to adjourn the proceedings where it is considered necessary to be in the public interest to do so. In arriving at its decision the Sub-committee gave considerable weight to the public interest test, having regard to the rules of natural justice and the applicant’s right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention on human rights pursuant to the The Human Rights Act 1998. In light of the exceptional circumstances put forward it was necessary for the Sub-committee to strike the right balance between the parties so that neither party was adversely prejudiced by delay. On that basis , the sub-committee felt it was just and reasonable in the circumstances to adjourn the application
The sub-committee advised the applicant’s representative at the meeting that should the applicant fail to attend the rescheduled hearing for whatever reason, the application would be heard in his absence.
|
|
Application by the Metropolitan Police to review the premises license for NW Bar (61 Walm Lane, Willesden, NW2) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 Decision: that the application by the Metropolitan Police to review the premises licence for ‘NW Bar’ (61 Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QR) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) heard that the premises licence holder was unable to attend the hearing due to a bereavement in his family and had requested that the application be adjourned. In accordance with Paragraph 20 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005, the Sub-committee has the power to adjourn the proceedings where it is considered necessary to be in the public interest to do so, having regard to the rules of natural justice and the applicants right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention on human rights pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1998. In light of the exceptional circumstances put forward it was necessary for the Sub-committee to strike the right balance between the parties so that neither party was prejudiced by delay. On that basis , the sub-committee felt that it was just and reasonable in the circumstances to adjourn the application
The sub-committee advised the premises licence holder’s representative at the meeting that should the applicant fail to attend the re-scheduled hearing, the application would be heard in his absence.
Minutes: that the application by the Metropolitan Police to review the premises licence for ‘NW Bar’ (61 Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QR) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) heard that the premises licence holder was unable to attend the hearing due to a bereavement in his family and had requested that the application be adjourned. In accordance with Paragraph 20 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005, the Sub-committee has the power to adjourn the proceedings where it is considered necessary to be in the public interest to do so, having regard to the rules of natural justice and the applicants right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention on human rights pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1998. In light of the exceptional circumstances put forward it was necessary for the Sub-committee to strike the right balance between the parties so that neither party was prejudiced by delay. On that basis , the sub-committee felt that it was just and reasonable in the circumstances to adjourn the application
The sub-committee advised the premises licence holder’s representative at the meeting that should the applicant fail to attend the re-scheduled hearing, the application would be heard in his absence.
|
|
Application by Javid Hussain for a premises license for Cut & Save (14 High Road, Willesden, NW10 2QW) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 Decision: that the application by Javid Hussain for a premises licence for ‘Cut & Save’ (14 High Road, Willesden, NW10 2QW) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The applicant had previously submitted an application to the Licensing Authority on the 11 July 2011 (“The old application”) which was superseded by a later application (“The current application”) received with amendments on 14 November 2011. The documentation supplied to the Sub-Committee was incomplete in that it erroneously included the old application as part of the original bundle of papers. The bundle should have included the “current” application which would have been determined by the Sub-committee in the usual course of events. The Council has a duty to consider the current application on its individual merits along with the evidence. During discussions, Members sought clarity concerning the identity of the proposed designated premises supervisor as this was not clear from the representations put forward by the Police, the Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) therefore deemed it necessary due to this procedural error and the need for the applicant and Police to liaise together so as to clear any ambiguities generally with regard to the current application to adjourn the application so that it could consider the applicant’s latest application at a future date.
Minutes: that the application by Javid Hussain for a premises licence for ‘Cut & Save’ (14 High Road, Willesden, NW10 2QW) (“the premises”) pursuant to the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003 be adjourned.
The applicant had previously submitted an application to the Licensing Authority on the 11 July 2011 (“The old application”) which was superseded by a later application (“The current application”) received with amendments on 14 November 2011. The documentation supplied to the Sub-Committee was incomplete in that it erroneously included the old application as part of the original bundle of papers. The bundle should have included the “current” application which would have been determined by the Sub-committee in the usual course of events. The Council has a duty to consider the current application on its individual merits along with the evidence. During discussions, Members sought clarity concerning the identity of the proposed designated premises supervisor as this was not clear from the representations put forward by the Police, the Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee (C) therefore deemed it necessary due to this procedural error and the need for the applicant and Police to liaise together so as to clear any ambiguities generally with regard to the current application to adjourn the application so that it could consider the applicant’s latest application at a future date.
|