Issue - meetings

This report sets out the draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2025-26 as required by the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2015 (as amended) which details the outcome of the annual review of the effectiveness of the Council’s governance framework, including its system of internal control.

Members are asked to note that the the format and structure of the AGS has been refreshed for this year and is aligned with the CIPFA/SOLACE Delivering Good Governance in  Local Government Framework Addendum (2025) and is being presented to the Audit & Standards Advisory Committee for consideration, in advance of referral on to the Audit and Standards Committee for formal approval.

This report sets out the draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2024-25 as required by the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2015.

Members are asked to note that the AGS is being presented to the Audit & Standards Advisory Committee for consideration, in advance of referral on to the Audit and Standards Committee for formal approval

(Agenda republished to include the attached report on 12 June 2025)

Marsha Henry, Director of Law, introduced a report from the Corporate Director finance & Resources that set out the draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2024-25 as required by the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2015.

In presenting the report the Committee noted:

• The seven core governance principles introduced by CIPFA upon which the review of governance arrangements and production of the AGS had been based, as detailed in section 3.5 of the report.

• That no significant governance issues had been identified relating to 2024-25, however some areas of improvement had been identified, as detailed in section paragraph 5 Table 1 within the Annual Governance Statement.  The AGS had also included reference to the outcome of the Corporate Peer Challenge and comprehensive action plan produced in response, the Procurement Review as well as the Council’s self-referral to the housing regulator along with work being undertaken to deliver a refreshed People Strategy accompanied by an updated Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Strategy and introduction of the “embrace change” programme .  Details were also provided in relation to progress made in delivery of the Improvement Plan from 2023-24, as set out in section 3.11 of the report.

• The importance of the AGS in outlining the Council’s framework of control in relation to its Governance arrangements and in terms of managing risk, with the review of effectiveness in relation to governance related issues an ongoing process involving officers responsible for key elements of the governance framework as well as members of the Corporate Governance Group, who throughout the year have oversight of governance related issues, supported by the Code of Corporate Governance which had been adopted by the Council and was included as Appendix B to the report.

Having thanked Marsha Henery for presentation of the report, the Chair advised members that they were being invited to comment on the draft AGS in advance of its formal consideration and approval by the Audit and Standards Committee. As a result, the following issues were highlighted:

• In noting the assurance included relating to the role of the Audit & Standards Advisory Committee, the Committee were pleased to note that no significant governance issues had been identified within the AGS although reference was made to the need to ensure paragraph 4.13.3 was updated to reflect the key recommendation and areas for improvements identified as part of the External Audit of the Council’s 2024-25 Statement of Accounts (as opposed to 2022-23 currently referenced in the AGS) and improvement actions identified as a result of the annual review of governance.

·       Members were also keen to ensure that a review of section 5.4 within the AGS was undertaken in relation to the Council’s Self-Referral to the Regulator of Social Housing which it was felt should also include reference to the recorded survey information held in relation to Council Stock. The Committee were reminded that whilst the council had reported it held stock data on 95% of its homes it had subsequently been identified that it did not hold recorded survey information on over  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11