Issue - meetings
Barham Park Strategic Property Review
Meeting: 10/09/2024 - Barham Park Trust Committee (Item 7.)
7. Barham Park Strategic Property Review PDF 369 KB
This report provides an update on the the strategic options for addressing the current challenges and improving the Barham Park Estate to better deliver the Trust's charitable purposes.
Additional documents:
- 07a. Appendix 1 - Feasibility Study, item 7. PDF 7 MB
- 07b. Appendix 2 - Timeline, item 7. PDF 418 KB
Decision:
RESOLVED:
(1) In relation to the Strategic Property Review options outlined within the report, to adopt development option 1 (bronze) with redevelopment and strategic investment beginning in 2031.
(2) To authorise officers to develop proposals for expanding the Trust's charitable purposes to be submitted for approval to the Charity Commission to allow broader uses of the buildings and bring a report on the proposals to a future Trust Committee meeting.
Eligible for call-in: Yes
Deadline for submission of call-in: 6pm on Tuesday 17 September 2024
Meeting: 05/09/2023 - Barham Park Trust Committee (Item 8)
8 Barham Park Strategic Property Review PDF 591 KB
This report provides an update on the Barham Park Strategic Property Review, including the position regarding the restrictive covenant relating to 776-778 Harrow Road.
Additional documents:
- 7a. Appendix 1 - Barham Park Buildings Feasibility Study - Silver Option, item 8 PDF 6 MB
- 7b. Appendix 2 - Barham Park Buildings Feasibility Study - Enhanced Gold Option, item 8 PDF 1 MB
- 7c. Appendix 3 (Exempt) - Restrictive Covenant Valuation , View reasons restricted (8/4)
Decision:
RESOLVED to:
(1) To note the outcomes from the architect’s feasibility study commissioned by the Council on behalf of the Trust, as detailed within the report.
(2) To delegate authority to the Director for Environment and Leisure Services in consultation with the Chair of the Trust Committee to:
(a) Obtain detailed costings of the preferred option presented in the architect’s report including a cost/benefit analysis and financial appraisal of the proposed scheme.
(b) Undertake detailed analysis of the legal risks associated with the proposed scheme and the means as to their mitigation and management.
(c) Prepare a draft investment strategy to establish the Council’s ability to fund the refurbishment proposal and prepare an outline delivery plan for consideration by the Trust.
(3) To agree for the Director for Environment and Leisure Services in consultation with the Chair of the Trust Committee to report back the findings and recommendations to the next available Trust Committee, outlining the suggested interventions, the amount of funding required to deliver the whole Estate option being recommended by RLB, and the potential financial options that would enable delivery of the scheme.
(4) To agree to hold in abeyance the letting/lease renewal of units 2, 7 and 8 until such time as the Director for Environment and Leisure Services has considered the viability of progressing the proposed scheme, with an update being provided at the next available Trust Committee.
(5) Agree for the Director for Environment and Leisure Services in consultation with the Chair of the Trust Committee to negotiate in principle the variation of the restrictive covenant in respect of 776 and 778 Harrow Road for the best terms that can reasonably be obtained, subject to final approval by the Trust Committee, and any approval required by the Charity Commission under the Charities Act 2022 and 2011.
Minutes:
Chris Whyte (Director of Environment & Leisure) supported by Denish Patel (Head of Property) introduced a report providing an update on the Barham Park Strategic Property Review, including the position regarding the restrictive covenant relating to 776-778 Harrow Road. In introducing the report, the Trust Committee noted:
· The appointment, following the Trust meeting on 27 January 2022, of an architect, Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB), who had been commissioned to prepare a feasibility study on design options to address the issues identified in relation to the infrastructure and condition of the Barham Park Estate. The study had been commissioned in order to provide a more holistic review of options towards the Estate’s infrastructure & maintenance given the wider impact on its effective operation and running costs.
The report detailed the outcome of the feasibility study, including the key elements of the initial concept, proposed design and high-level cost estimates with the options designed to focus on the renovation and potential reconfiguration of the existing old court buildings. The Trust Committee were advised that in undertaking the study the aim had been to look at options that whilst cost-effective would not only preserve the historically significant parts of the structure but also enhance the overall relationship between the building and park and enable the development of upgraded and adaptable facilities, new spaces and modern facilities to reflect market demand and trends with respect to a wide variety of sustainable community uses. In recognising the current position relating to the configuration and maintenance of the existing building, the Trust Committee were advised that the feasibility study had resulted in three different design options being identified, as summarised in section 3 of the report. Whilst the bronze option had been discounted early in the design process due to the insufficient value identified, details on the Silver and Gold feasibility options had been set out within Appendices 2 and 3 of the report, which at this stage it was noted had been provided for initial feedback and to show what might be possible.
In considering the update provided the Trust Committee was advised of the additional work that would be required to develop the options for further consideration, which would include identification of the necessary capital investment required (estimated at between £300-400k) and consultation and engagement with both statutory and non-statutory consultees, including existing tenants and other relevant stakeholders in the park. In supporting the need for a full engagement and consultation process, the Trust Committee were advised this would be undertaken once the necessary investment strategy had been identified and that pending this, there would be no impact on the occupation of existing tenants arising from the feasibility study.
· The details provided within Appendix 3 of the report (classified as containing exempt information) on the independent valuation that had been commissioned on behalf of the Trust (following the decision taken by the Trust Committee on 1 September 2021) as part of the process in seeking to explore the possibility of reaching an agreement to vary the ... view the full minutes text for item 8