Agenda and minutes
Venue: Conference Hall - Brent Civic Centre, Engineers Way, Wembley, HA9 0FJ. View directions
Contact: Peter Goss, Democratic Services Manager 020 8937 1353, Email: peter.goss@brent.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Procedural motion Minutes: Councillor Warren moved a procedural motion which proposed a change to the circulated seating plan to allow his Group to sit in front row seats in place of Labour councillors and requested that the vote be recorded. Following a vote the motion was declared LOST.
Voting was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Davidson, Shaw and Warren
AGAINST: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Colwill, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kansagra, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, Maurice, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
ABSTAIN: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor and Councillors Carr and Duffy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes of the previous meeting PDF 78 KB To approve the minutes of the Annual Meeting held on 20 May 2015. Minutes: RESOLVED:-
that the minutes of the Annual meeting held on 20 May 2015 be approved as an accurate record of the meeting, subject to the following amendments to minute 13: - Insert after 4th paragraph – A view was expressed that the way Council meetings operated needed to be reviewed to enable more backbench councillors to participate, - The recorded vote to be reversed to read- FOR: Councillors Aden, Agha, Ahmed, Bradley, Butt, Chohan, Choudry, Choudhary, Colacicco, Collier, Colwill, Conneely, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Duffy, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kansagra, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Marquis, Mashari, Maurice, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Pavey, Perrin, Shahzad, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Tatler, Thomas and Van Kalwala (53) AGAINST: Councillors Carr, Davidson, Shaw and Warren (4) ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor, Councillor Jones (1)
(amendments incorporated)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of personal and prejudicial interests Members are invited to declare at this stage of the meeting, any relevant personal and prejudicial interests and discloseable pecuniary interest in any matter to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: Councillor Duffy declared a pecuniary interest in item 13 – West London Waste Plan having worked as an advisor on the plan. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayor's announcements (including any petitions received) The Mayor will make any announcements she has to make to the meeting and will refer to the schedule of petitions circulated. Minutes: The Mayor referred to the tragic death of six students in California, five of whom were Irish, when an apartment balcony collapsed. At least one person was from South Dublin with which the Council was twinned. The thoughts of the Council were with the families, students and all those affected by the tragedy.
The Mayor invited all members to her civic welcome reception on 25 June at St Andrews Parish Church.
The Mayor congratulated James De Gale who had become the first Brtish Olympic gold medallist to achieve a world title by being crowned IBF Super Middleweight world champion the previous month. The Mayor pointed out that James De Gale had strong local connections having as a boy attended the Trojan Boxing Club in Stonebridge.
The Mayor congratulated Joseph McGeown from Neasden who had won in his age group at the 45th Annual World Irish Dancing Championships in Montreal, Canada.
The Mayor drew attention to the list of current petitions showing progress on dealing with them which had been circulated around the hall.
The Leader added his congratulations to the Mayor on being awarded the MBE in the Queens Birthday Honours list and members of the Council gave a round of applause. Councillor Kansagra also congratulated the Mayor on behalf of his group. Councillor Warren congratulated the Mayor and also a past Brent councillor, Peter Golds on being awarded the CBE. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appointments to committees and outside bodies and appointment of chairs/vice chairs To make any appointments submitted by each of the political groups. Minutes: RESOLVED:
that the following appointments be made:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report from the Leader or members of the Cabinet PDF 70 KB To receive reports from the Leader or members of the Cabinet in accordance with Standing Order 38. Minutes: The Leader reported that he had attended a meeting of the Mayoral Development Corporation at which presentations were received from QPR Football Club and Cargiant. Public consultation on proposals by Cargiant had begun and the Council would be ensuring it pursued the necessary benefits to the area from the development. The Leader stated that the report of the Health Commission was being finalised for submission by end of July. The Leader reported that the volunteering hub had been awarded to Groundworks and it was hoped to have 1000 volunteers working across Brent. The Leader stated that, as part of the West London Alliance, the Council was looking at the devolution agenda which would be the subject of further discussion within Brent. As part of this the Economic Prosperity Board was being established which would look at how influence could be brought to bear on employment and jobs in the area.
Councillor Mashari reported that the number of Living Wage employers in the borough had doubled since April. She congratulated Granger Herzog who had become the first Living Wage employer in Park Royal. Councillor Mashari reported on a summer business networking event on 25 June and a business start up event in September. With the Deputy Mayor, she would be visiting local businesses across the borough during the summer months to hear their concerns and to encourage the establishment of local trader associations. Referring to the Government’s £12B welfare cuts she stated that this was likely to disproportionately affect boroughs like Brent. She reported that the Council was working more collaboratively than ever with the voluntary and private sectors in an attempt to mitigate the worse impacts of the Benefit Cap. Councillor Mashari reported that the Working Places Working People employment support scheme would be launched on 27 June providing a single place for support services to be co-located to help people get into work and out of poverty.
Councillor Moher updated Council on school places. The Authority had received 4,350 reception applications for September 2015 and all had been allocated a place with 80% getting their first preference. She was confident there would be places available for new applications received. The pressure for places meant that the Preston Road Library building would need to be used for a further year. Of the 11+ transfers, all applicants had been made an offer with 64% getting their first preference. The number of school places continued to expand with the expansion of Stonebridge Primary school being agreed at the last Cabinet meeting. Since March there had been five OFSTED inspections where the schools concerned had been judged either good or outstanding. Councillor Moher reported that Cabinet had agreed to consult on providing youth services in a different way. Young people would be given a central role in the consultation and the outcome was due at Cabinet on 3 October 2015. Councillor Moher referred to the recent sentencing of a paedophile from Brent. The offender had not previously been known to the Council ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deputation To hear any deputations received from members of the public in accordance with standing order 39. Minutes: Charlie Glazebrook, a representative of the Ranelagh and Honeywood Roads Neighbourhood Watch, accompanied by Charlie de Courcy, presented a petition concerning the blight on the area caused by the activities that took place in a road called The Avenue running from Honeywood Road into Harlesden Town. He asked for the neighbourhood to be supported by installing CCTV or for members and officers to visit the area to see what could be done.
Councillor Denselow responded by saying that the local ward councillors had drawn attention to the situation but the number of police reports would not warrant the deployment of static CCTV but mobile CCTV might be an option. Other anti social behaviour powers available to the Council could also be brought into use. The first action would be to visit the area with officers to draw up a plan of action. He thanked the deputation for attending the meeting.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Questions from the Opposition and other Non- Cabinet Members Questions to be put to members of the Cabinet in accordance with standing order 40. Minutes: Councillor Kelcher referred to the Kensal Rise Library building and asked if the community could be congratulated for their work and Council could be updated on progress on when there would be Brent’s first community library on the site and if there was any information about the plaque commemorating Mark Twain’s visit which was previously removed by the Council. Councillor Denslow replied that it was a mark of local communities fighting for their services and that the Council would look at how it could assist community libraries to get established as well as running first class libraries itself.
Councillor Davidson noted the historic achievement of Harlesden’s James DeGale in becoming the first British boxer to win an Olympic gold medal and a world championship title. He asked why his proposal to award James DeGale the freedom of the borough had so far been ignored. Councillor Butt congratulated James DeGale for his achievement and replied that only the Council could bestow such an honour to any individual and that it would have been more fitting if the matter had been proposed for discussion rather than airing it in public.
Councillor Naheerathan felt it was now more important than ever for tenants to be protected from landlords who set rents unfairly and asked what was being done to protect private tenants’ rights and ensure good landlords were not undermined by bad ones. Councillor McLennan replied that there was an unprecedented demand for housing particularly in the private sector with 35% of Brent’s housing stock in the private rented sector. The Council had successfully introduced landlord licensing requiring minimum standards and inspectors were now enforcing these requirements. The message that Brent had a zero tolerance of poor quality property in the private rented sector was being heard.
Councillor Choudry referred to the upcoming Government Budget and the expectation that it would produce a very hard settlement for Brent. He asked what the worst case scenario might be for the borough over the next 5 years, how this would affect Brent residents and the Council’s ability to provide them with assistance and what strategies the Council would need to adopt to deliver the services needed by local people. Councillor Butt replied that he felt the Government was intent on destroying local government. The financial situation was making it very difficult for Brent but he was confident that the Council could continue to deliver the services that the most vulnerable residents needed, provide sufficient school places and services for the young and elderly. The Borough Plan would provide the strategy for delivering the services needed.
Councillor Colacicco asked if the Council would support and complement the Brent CAD (Community Action on Dementia) and Ashford Place scheme to make Mapesbury a ‘dementia friendly’ ward with initiatives such as slow lanes in shops, a wandering scheme and the dementia cafe. Councillor Hirani replied that he had met with people to discuss how Brent could take action to become a dementia friendly borough. Signage inside the Civic Centre ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report from the Chair of Scrutiny Committee PDF 84 KB To receive a report from the Chair of the Scrutiny Committee in accordance with Standing Order 41. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Filson introduced his report. He reported that in addition to the items identified on the forward plan that had largely been set by the previous committee, additional items identified for scrutiny consisted of the Council’s food standards operation, the move into the Civic Centre, CCTV, a continuation of the work of the current Access to GP services task group, South Kilburn regeneration and garden waste. He referred to the education co-opted members and appointed observers serving on the Scrutiny Committee and that he wanted to be sure they were involved as part of the scrutiny process looking into areas of education provision. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appointment of Chief Executive PDF 67 KB To approve the appointment of the Chief Executive for The London Borough of Brent and to designate an Officer of the Council as the Council’s Head of Paid Service. Minutes: On behalf of their respective Groups, Councillors Butt, Kansagra and Warren welcomed the appointment of Carolyn Downs as the Council’s new Chief Executive.
RESOLVED:
that the appointment of Carolyn Downs, CB as Chief Executive be approved and that she be designated as the Head of Paid Service with effect from 7 September 2015.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Representation of Opposition Political Groups on Committees PDF 84 KB Further to the Council’s review of the representation of different political groups on committees at its annual meeting and the allocation and appointment of seats to the majority group, this report discharges the Council’s duty to allocate seats to the opposition groups and to make appointments. Minutes: The Head of Legal introduced the report which sought to discharge the Council’s duty to allocate seats to the opposition groups and make appointments. She read out a proposal for appointments to committees which had been submitted by Councillor Kansagra and was subject to the decision of Council on the allocation of places.
Councillor Warren objected to the proposed appointments put forward and stated that if these were agreed he would decline making appointments to the remaining committee places. The Head of Legal advised that this would mean that he would be formally notified of the allocation of seats and have a further three week period to submit appointments and if he failed to do so Council could make such appointments as it saw fit at its next meeting.
The Head of Legal advised that a place on the Health and Wellbeing Board was allocated to the Brent Conservative Group.
Councillor Warren requested a recorded vote.
RESOLVED:
(i) that the allocation of seats on committees to the opposition political groups be as set out below:
(ii) that the following appointments be made:
In view of the allocation of seats by Full Council, Councillor Warren declined to submit nominations for the places reserved for his Group.
Voting was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Colwill, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Duffy, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kansagra, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, Maurice, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
AGAINST: Councillors Davidson, Shaw and Warren
ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor and Councillor Carr |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dismissal of statutory officers PDF 287 KB This report explains changes to the law relating to the dismissal of certain statutory officers. It seeks Council’s approval to establish a new panel and to amend Standing Orders. Additional documents: Minutes: The Head of Legal introduced the report which explained the change in law relating to the dismissal of certain statutory officers and proposed measures to conform to the new requirements.
Councillor Warren queried the proposals by pointing out that the proposed exchange between the Cabinet and General Purposes Committee set out in the report only involved a difference in membership of one councillor. He proposed an additional recommendation asking Council to request General Purposes Committee to review the procedure for dealing with the issue of ‘excessive pay-offs for senior local authority staff’ recognising that this was the actual reason for the new regulations and to report back Council and requested a recorded vote on his proposal.
The vote for Councillor Warren’s proposal was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Davidson, Shaw and Warren
AGAINST: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Carr, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Colwill, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Duffy, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kansagra, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, Maurice, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor
RESOLVED:
(i) that a Dismissal Advisory Panel be established, comprising three independent persons appointed to deal with Member Code of Conduct complaints under the Localism Act 2011, to fulfil the role of ‘the Panel’ referred to in the Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2015;
(ii) that the terms of reference of the Dismissal Advisory Panel as set out at paragraph 3.15 of the report submitted be approved and the establishment of the Panel be included in the Council’s Constitution;
(iii) that the Chief Operating Officer be authorised to explore the possibility of sharing independent persons appointed by other councils, whether or not on a reciprocal basis, and report to the General Purposes Committee for its approval;
(iv) that the proposed amendments to Standing Orders as set out at paragraph 3.17 of the report submitted be approved and the Monitoring Officer be authorised to make any further consequential changes to the Constitution to reflect the new statutory framework;
(v) to note that the disciplinary and dismissal procedures for the roles of Chief Executive, Monitoring Officer and Chief Finance Officer will be reviewed by the General Purposes Committee to reflect the new arrangements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shared Internal Audit Services PDF 136 KB This report sets out a proposal to share internal audit services with the London Boroughs of Ealing and Hounslow. Minutes: Members had before them a report setting out proposals for sharing internal audit services with the London Boroughs of Ealing and Hounslow.
RESOLVED:
(i) that the provision of the Council’s internal audit service be delegated to the London Borough of Ealing with effect from 1 October 2015 or such other date as may be reasonably agreed with the London Borough of Ealing;
(ii) that the cost of operation of such delegated internal audit service by the London Borough of Ealing be noted as initially at least £75,000 less than the current service cost;
(iii) that an agreement be entered into confirming the terms of delegation and the Chief Finance Officer in consultation with the Chief Legal Officer be delegated the power to determine the precise terms of the legal agreements, as set out in section 6 of the report submitted;
(iv) that the proposed staffing arrangements be agreed, including the transfer of internal audit and investigation staff to the London Borough of Ealing as set out in paragraphs 4.5 and 4.6 of the report submitted;
(v) that it be noted that this arrangement will enable the council to reduce the number of heads of service employed by one, the saving from which will contribute towards the £1.4m to be achieved through the corporate management restructure;
(vi) that the Chief Legal Officer be authorised to make any necessary changes to the Council’s Constitution to reflect the delegation of the internal audit function to the London Borough of Ealing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West London Waste Plan PDF 158 KB This report explains that the Council has received an Inspector’s report into the Examination of the joint West London Waste Plan Development Plan Document and that the Inspector finds the document sound subject to recommended changes being made. It asks Full Council agree the adoption of the Waste Plan with the changes incorporated. The changes were considered and recommended for approval by Cabinet on 1 June 2015, but it is a legal requirement that all planning documents forming part of the Development Plan are formally agreed by Full Council.
A copy of the submission plan and the Inspector’s report on the Examination into the West London Waste Plan can be found here . Minutes: The report before members dealt with the Inspector’s report into the Examination of the West London Waste Plan.
RESOLVED:
that the West London Waste Plan, as amended by incorporating the recommended changes set out in the Inspector’s report, be adopted.
[Councillor Duffy declared a pecuniary interest in the above item]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motions To debate the motions submitted in accordance with Standing Order 45. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government cuts Minutes: Councillor Kelcher presented the motion circulated in his name.
In response, Councillor Maurice stated that whilst Brent may have elected Labour MPs, the rest of the country voted in a Conservative Government. He suggested that if Labour could have formed a government it would have joined with the SDP and funding would have been directed to Scotland. Councillor Collier stated that whilst the Chancellor talked tough, he took the soft options by inflicting the deepest cuts in those areas that affected the most vulnerable. Whilst it was regrettable to have to introduce the green waste charge, this covered part of the costs of home care. He would rather the Council risked being unpopular than take easy political decisions. Councillor Warren felt that members needed to be honest with residents and explain the need to address the size of the welfare budget whilst protecting the most vulnerable. He requested a recorded vote on the motion.
The motion was put to the vote and declared CARRIED.
RESOLVED:
(i) that the people of Brent overwhelmingly rejected the outgoing government, and have given no mandate to the incoming Conservative one; however, they will have to face the brunt of the cuts that Prime Minister Cameron and Chancellor Osborne are committed to making;
(ii) that these cuts have not been determined by fairness, but electoral expediency; the Chancellor talked tough with his plans to cut £12 billion from welfare overall, and billions more from other departments, but he has run scared of tough choices, hiding where cuts will fall behind empty phrases, such as ‘good housekeeping’;
(iii) that unlike the Conservative government, the Council promises to be straight with the people of Brent; many – often with the loudest voices – would reverse the Green Waste charge or wish for a council tax cut, but the effect on all residents, and not just those with the sharpest elbows will be considered;
(iv) that when politicians offer what looks like a free lunch, the Council will ask who really pays; and what services for the vulnerable will we have to be sacrificed for these easy headlines;
(v) that unlike this government, honesty and fairness will guide this council in the year to come; that way this borough will ensure it is run for all the people of Brent.
Voting was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Duffy, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
AGAINST: Councillors Carr, Colwill, Davidson, Kansagra, Maurice, Shaw and Warren
ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Garden waste service Minutes: Councillor Kansagra moved the motion circulated in his name and that of Councillors Colwill and Maurice which sought to request the Cabinet to revoke the garden waste collection scheme. He stated that the Government had been elected in the knowledge that a further £12B cuts would be imposed and these would be implemented fairly. The Council had made substantial savings and cut a lot of wastage but he felt there was more that could be cut and therefore the income from the garden waste scheme was not needed. He submitted that it represented a tax on residents rather than a charge and the number of complaints received about it made it clear it should be revoked. Councillor Warren submitted that a motion to incur spending could only be effective if it identified where the money to fund it was coming from. He had consistently opposed the garden waste collection scheme and had included it in his budget proposals put to the March Council meeting. He therefore moved an amendment to the motion which the Head of Legal read to the meeting. This sought to identify where the funding should come from. Councillor Warren requested a recorded vote on his proposed amendment. Councillor Southwood questioned how it could be proposed that a decision now implement could be reversed without it costing the Council a large amount of money. She stated that the charge would remain and that implementation of the scheme had gone well.
The amendment moved by Councillor Warren was put to the vote and declared LOST.
Voting on the amendment was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Davidson, Shaw and Warren
AGAINST: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Carr, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Colwill, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kansagra, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, Maurice, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor
The motion was put to the vote and declared LOST.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Congratulations and career break Minutes: Councillor Warren moved the motion circulated in his name and that of Councillors Davidson and Shaw which sought the Council’s congratulations to the Conservative Party on winning the General Election and to call upon Councillor Butt to resign as London Councils’ lead member for Equalities. Councillor Davidson referred to the number of people in the borough that voted Conservative and the outcome of the General Election. He stated that this was because people believed in the Government’s economic vision. Councillor Butt stated that the people of Brent did not vote for a Conservative Government but the Council would work with the Government on behalf of its residents. He referred to Government proposals on repatriation that showed he had no lessons to learn from Conservatives on equalities. Councillor Kansagra added that London Councils was a democratic body and was fully aware of Councillor Butt’s record when it made its decision. He submitted that the decision to allow the racial discrimination case to follow the legal process was a correct one and that the Council had taken appropriate steps following the case. Councillor Warren requested a recorded vote.
The motion was put to the vote and declared LOST.
Voting was recorded as follows:
FOR: Councillors Davidson, Shaw and Warren
AGAINST: Councillors Aden, Agha, Allie, Bradley, Butt, Chohan, Choudhary, Choudry, Colacicco, Collier, Conneely, Crane, Daly, Denselow, Dixon, Duffy, Eniola, Ezeajughi, Farah, Filson, Harrison, Hector, Hirani, Hoda-Benn, Hossain, Hylton, Kabir, Kelcher, Khan, Long, Mahmood, Mashari, McLeish, McLennan, Miller, Moher, J Mitchell Murray, W Mitchell Murray, Naheerathan, Nerva, M Patel, R Patel, Shahzad, Ketan Sheth, Krupa Sheth, Southwood, Stopp, Thomas and Van Kalwala
ABSTENTIONS: The Mayor and Deputy Mayor and Councillors Carr, Colwill, Kansagra and Maurice
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urgent business At the discretion of the Mayor to consider any urgent business. Minutes: None. |